We are documenting all the time, it's part of the process
More Nucleus on BG Website
Feedback
Currently our documentation is lengthy
Team task
Find 2 examples within our documentation that are good
Find 2 examples within our documentation that are bad
Phased out, not Faced out
Text heavy
Brand alignment
Panel Component is misleading - nothing about the layout - names are inconsistent
Dialling our creative principles - things that don't exist any more
Frontify - is a poor experience
Inconsistent naming - typography
More than one source of truth - colours
Lockup Component - nonexistent
Where does Nucleus being and end? Brand guidelines - Designer playbook - check atlassian.design
Blanding page
Levels of information are inconsistent - high level, practical, rational, details
The Design System does not reflect us as a team
Explaining ourselves
The "quotes are nice to skim read
Creating Illustrations - prescriptive - tools - no waffle - explain - thoughtful
Accordion Component - easy to understand - real examples within documentation
The content around the principles
The Landmark section especially the Specification table
Do's and Don't - real good to consume
Becoming Nucleus
The use of active verbs on our Homepage CTAs
Events section - projecting a timeline of our history - about our community
Wish list
Note down anything that you'd like to see form part of the Design System